I will note that the process is new. It is relatively untested. It has all sorts of new complexities.
We are for saving Social Security.
The American people say, 'Not interested. Don't want to do that.'
Cut Social Security benefits--we are against that. We are plain, straightforward against that.
And the way to look at it holistically is to say let's quit importing it, like 60+ major developed nations have done.
For generations, we have known the harmful and lethal effects of asbestos and the grave threat it poses to public health...
Thank you, Chairman Merkley, for supporting the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, which is rooted in medical evidence...
Thank you very much. With your permission, we will submit the entire testimony for the record.
Any expert will convey that there is no level of exposure to asbestos that is safe for the human body.
Good. I will just note that as Mr. Simon testified, now two-thirds of the production is done by the new cell membrane.
The threat posed by asbestos affects all Americans the same. It doesn't matter what party they belong to, and the soluti...
The majority of increases in life expectancy have been to those in the top half of the income distribution, and meanwhil...
The wealthy are disproportionately causing the tax cheating problem.
But those companies that transitioned, did they go out of business because of these higher costs you are referring to?
I know that you have been immersed in this issue for a long time.
I have proposed the billionaire income tax, which would mean that billionaires would pay taxes every year.
No. They took over two-thirds of the industry.
In closing, given what we know today, asbestos is public enemy No. 1 and must be banned now.
