I just want to know, do you agree with that, that we should trade off energy security for this country in favor of a climate change agenda?

If the Cook Inlet prospect would be developed, there would be additional government revenues and greater energy security for the State of Alaska . . .

I am appalled by the contents of this memo, which made crystal clear that this Administration is literally putting their radical climate change agenda ahead of the needs of the people of Alaska and the United States.

I think, is the most potentially--and this quite a high bar I might add--the most unbelievable statement I have heard from a member of this Administration.

I just want to come back, Madam Secretary, to this trade-off between energy security and the radical climate change agenda that you have endorsed.

I just want to know, do you agree with that, that we should trade off energy security for this country in favor of a climate change agenda?

I am appalled by the contents of this memo, which made crystal clear that this Administration is literally putting their radical climate change agenda ahead of the needs of the people of Alaska and the United States.

I just want to come back, Madam Secretary, to this trade-off between energy security and the radical climate change agenda that you have endorsed.

your decision to trade off our energy security in favor of a radical climate change agenda is making us more and more dependent on China

Why should those things for millions of Americans be sacrificed in favor of your agenda for radical climate change?

Why should those things for millions of Americans be sacrificed in favor of your agenda for radical climate change?

You are not moving forward. You are moving backward. You are shutting down and denying permits for mines in this country

I want to take the strongest possible exception to that comment and to that entire mentality.

I think, is the most potentially--and this quite a high bar I might add--the most unbelievable statement I have heard from a member of this Administration.

If the Cook Inlet prospect would be developed, there would be additional government revenues and greater energy security for the State of Alaska . . .

I think, is the most potentially--and this quite a high bar I might add--the most unbelievable statement I have heard from a member of this Administration.

you are telling me that we have too many jobs in this country?

Why should those things for millions of Americans be sacrificed in favor of your agenda for radical climate change?