I believe what you are referring to is Davis-Bacon prevailing wage, among other things.

I really encourage you to come back next year and say, we do have some mass timber buildings that we have acquired for use or are building.

if the ultra-wealthy paid their fair share of taxes, there wouldn't be such a serious Medicare shortfall.

A--as you know, our theory is give everybody in America a chance to get ahead. And that is what the menu's all about.

Would a candidate's use of a completely falsified digital image of the opponent saying something that the person had never said, would that be illegal under current election law?

Would a candidate's use of a completely falsified digital image of the opponent saying something that the person had never said, would that be illegal under current election law?

It is mostly about chronic illness, cancer, diabetes, heart disease, strokes, and not just acute care.

Now is not the time to be cutting the EPA budget.

Okay. A--as you know, our theory is give everybody in America a chance to get ahead. And that is what the menu's all about.

I recognize there is some uncertainty about exactly where the line is, and that is part of why this hearing is so important as we think about this elaboration.

I thank my colleague from California for yielding time. I rise in strong support of the Protecting Hunting Heritage and Education Act, which passed unanimously out of the Education and Workforce Committee by a 42-0 vote. This is how…

Before he retired, the late Orrin Hatch and I said, Medicare today is not the Medicare we had when we were coming up.

We are seeing that the plastic which is made with fossil gas is a huge contributor to climate chaos, which we are suffering everywhere.

I really encourage you to come back next year and say, we do have some mass timber buildings that we have acquired for use or are building.

We have to address the border first, because otherwise what do we have to build upon when it comes to creating a comprehensive system?

the ultra-wealthy can fire off a text to their accountant and say, make sure I don't pay income or payroll taxes this year.

An advertisement in which one candidate says, hey, my opponent took this position and said such and such, and that is not true. That is not true. That is a violation?

Would a candidate's use of a completely falsified digital image of the opponent saying something that the person had never said, would that be illegal under current election law?