
It is interesting that the gentlewoman across the aisle mentioned Ukraine because as the majority leader so succinctly pointed out, Joe Biden's policies of shutting down American energy production is actually funneling money to Vladimir…
On the public record
Every politician on the site, every statement on file. Search, filter, and read the public record.
25,900+·quotes on file

It is interesting that the gentlewoman across the aisle mentioned Ukraine because as the majority leader so succinctly pointed out, Joe Biden's policies of shutting down American energy production is actually funneling money to Vladimir…

On his first day in office, Biden launched a war on American fossil fuels when he killed the Keystone XL pipeline, destroying jobs and forcing dependency on Chinese batteries. Gas prices have doubled since Biden began his war, creating the…

Does anyone on the panel know if Commerce is doing anything related to this executive order?

Us not doing anything this Congress is a response to my colleagues across the aisle spending about $7 trillion last Congress.

I urge Congress to consider that we already have many proposals that have some bipartisan support.

A lot of these companies are global. I mean, could they not just move their development overseas outside the jurisdiction of the U.S., or does the Defense Production Act somehow extend beyond our borders?

Should we trust the government to be the ultimate arbiter of what is disinformation and what may cause social harm in AI systems?

Last October 30, the White House released a monumentally lengthy executive order on artificial intelligence.

That is why Congress is moving cautiously in this space.

We do not want to stifle innovation. We do not want to stifle investment in AI or its innovation in any way, shape, or form.

So basically, we took a problem and made it worse. It seems that way.

I would never, ever, ever, ever want to see government regulation, government requirements stifle our ability for this American company to advance technology as fast as it has.

this use of the DPA appears to be executive overreach and, quite frankly, illegal.

Let us focus on some specific targeted harms but not tech specific.

I know Dr. Lee is going to disagree here. So why does it not, in your opinion, because to me it is so obvious.

the new executive powers this EO asserts have no logical sunset.

the risk that we relinquish our current lead in AI to China, and that could have catastrophic implications for our military preparedness.