I have one question that I would like to ask in the spirit of a colloquy to my dear friend from Iowa. They are saying 1 year, and they are looking at the compromised, bipartisan bill we have worked on. In 3 or 4 years the rates may go up because market rates will change. If we are only looking at 1 year, is there anything prohibitive in our bill that we couldn't go back a year from now if we see a better solution? If we get an education bill, we can say: Hey, here is the grand bargain, which is better than what we thought we had. Still yet, our bill saves $9 billion, and the bill my dear friends in my caucus support only saves $2 billion. If we only do it for 1 year, we help more people save more money, and then we can still rewrite another bill in 1 year. Are we able to do that?
On the recordJuly 10, 2013
Source
govinfo.govShare & report
More from Joe Manchin
Dec 11, 2024
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 5646, which was received from the House and is at the desk. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The clerk will report the bill by title. The…
Jun 4, 2024
President Biden, however, has abandoned the Maximum Pressure strategy, under the Biden administration, Iran's revenue from exports of oil products has risen to over $100 billion.
Jul 24, 2024
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that privileges of the floor be granted to the following interns in my office: Paul Baier and Harper Katz during the pendency of the month of July. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so…





