On the recordMarch 18, 2010
Mr. President, the body will consider two amendments today that propose to limit some discretionary spending. Regrettably, both amendments contain significant flaws, and I will oppose both of them for that reason. The amendment proposed by the Senator from Alabama, Mr. Sessions, and the Senator from Missouri, Mrs. McCaskill, propose to limit some discretionary spending over the next 5 fiscal years. However, those limits include a giant loophole, as the proposal includes a complete exemption for spending on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The proposal in no way requires that such funding be offset, or be subject to the usual supermajority thresholds that the Senate imposes on spending beyond that for which the body budgets. Under the amendment, spending on those wars is completely unrestrained, and would be added right onto the government's budget deficits. This is not a small matter. To date, spending for those wars has totaled roughly $1 trillion and not one cent has been paid for. The cost of those wars has been added directly to our budget deficits, swelling our already mountainous public debt, and increasing the burden we are leaving our children and grandchildren to bear. The question of whether these wars are in the best interest of our national security is, of course, a primary concern. Having made the decision to pursue that course, though, we should not just shove the cost off on future generations. But that is just what this amendment would do.…





