That kind of speaks to really defining the scope of the project.
From the first panel, it seemed like the direction we were moving was trying to bring these contracts into smaller bite-sized pieces.
That is definitely heightening the concern in trying to speed this process up to address that fact.
We are trying to really take care of prior mismanagement back when the environment was not even considered.
Who primarily drives those changes? Is that from the Safety Board? Is that the government?
It is Hanford where we are actually getting leakage right now, too, isn't it?
How do you develop a process that actually works?
Security clearances, we have clearances for individuals, but we also have them for contractors and for facilities, correct?
How many man-hours does the first certification process take? How many man-hours are involved in a surveillance audit?
There is literally no standard, no guidance for what circumstances require a clearance. None.
If we could apply these standardized type of processes across the government, I think we would be in a far better place.