Use the tax code to collect the revenue the government needs as simply and fairly as possible.

It ends up being incredibly complex.

This is the futility of trying to punish individuals, you know, trying to punish their success. It just doesn't work.

It's way too complex, right? So, when you have something really complex, that's something that can be taken advantage of, correct?

we've already spent $5 to $6 trillion, that's $5,000 to $6,000 billion, trying to mitigate climate change, and we haven't made a dent in it.

One quick comment, closing comment is this hearing ought to be called Riskier Business, How Massive Deficit Spending Which Caused Inflation is Challenging the Insurance Markets.

fixing climate change isn't the solution.

we've already spent $5 to $6 trillion, that's $5,000 to $6,000 billion, trying to mitigate climate change, and we haven't made a dent in it.

fixing climate change isn't the solution.

One quick comment, closing comment is this hearing ought to be called Riskier Business, How Massive Deficit Spending Which Caused Inflation is Challenging the Insurance Markets.

But fixing climate change isn't the solution.

One quick comment, closing comment is this hearing ought to be called Riskier Business, How Massive Deficit Spending Which Caused Inflation is Challenging the Insurance Markets.

we've already spent $5 to $6 trillion, that's $5,000 to $6,000 billion, trying to mitigate climate change, and we haven't made a dent in it.

The Administration's rush to transition to an electric vehicle fleet appears to be driven more by political postering rather than military strategy.

I would argue fraudulent research is probably fueling more of the climate alarmism, creating opportunities than anything else.

Providing for the common defense is one of the federal government's top constitutional responsibilities.

I'm not a climate change denier. I'm just not an alarmist.

Climate change is hardly one of the most important challenges that the Defense Department ought to focus its attention on.

The Administration's rush to transition to an electric vehicle fleet appears to be driven more by political postering rather than military strategy.

Providing for the common defense is one of the federal government's top constitutional responsibilities.

My final comment, just imagine the human suffering we could've alleviated spending five to six trillion dollars trying to alleviate that, rather than hold back the tides which we're not--we won't be able to do.

My final comment, just imagine the human suffering we could've alleviated spending five to six trillion dollars trying to alleviate that, rather than hold back the tides which we're not--we won't be able to do.

Climate change is hardly one of the most important challenges that the Defense Department ought to focus its attention on.

I would argue fraudulent research is probably fueling more of the climate alarmism, creating opportunities than anything else.

Every dollar squandered by the Pentagon is a dollar that's not going towards keeping the country safe.