I am very concerned that when a fact witness represents a client who might be the target of an investigation there is a conflict of interest.

There seems to be different strokes for different folks on this. And that is what Americans are concerned about...

Why did Ms. Mills request immunity? Was she hiding something or was she afraid that something would incriminate her that was on her laptop?

Who authorized granting Cheryl Mills immunity?

Did she request immunity?

I think that one of the things that all of us who work for the government are supposed to do is to engender and increase public trust of government institutions, which isn't going very well now.

How do I tell my conservative constituents that they should increase their trust in the IRS and that what happened to a couple of my groups will never, ever happen again?

Only after the House Judiciary Committee has conducted a fair, thorough, and detailed investigation will Committee Members be able to consider whether Articles of Impeachment might be warranted.

This Administration has made a career or maybe history of basically ignoring whatever Congress wants to do in furtherance of its constitutional oversight responsibility.

That, in my opinion, is an impeachable offense.

You have a burden, I think, to convince the American public that you don't have a double standard.