Looking forward, our Special Operations Forces must remain flexible enough to counter the transnational terrorist threat with decisive force when warranted.

The threat from Al Qaeda is real. It is global, networked, and clandestine.

I completely support those. At the same time we have to recognize that so far they have not backed off on enriching plutonium beyond any plausible peaceful purpose.

I don't think that is acceptable, it is not the number we should be at, and I think as a Congress we should not forget that we still have a very strong obligation to address revenue and to address mandatory spending.

I think, too, the recognition that Iran's role is extremely unhelpful is simply part of dealing with reality.

I think there is a broadening international commitment to stopping what is going on there.

I welcome our witnesses as well, General Mattis, Admiral McRaven, General Fraser.

I just want to make a quick editorial comment, then I just have one question.

These operational necessities come as the military is being forced to shed force structure, curtail flying hours, and return ships to port.

We thank you for your service and your great leadership in your three very important commands.

However, an emphasis on direct action during the last 11 years of combat may have left our Special Operations Forces out of balance for a future that will increasingly require building partnership capacity and advisory and assistance…