On the recordDecember 1, 2017
The Senator is correct. The intent of the provision is to exclude all amounts paid or accrued for services costs with no markup. Thus amounts paid or accrued in that account would be excluded from the base erosion anti-abuse tax. Other accounts related to the same transaction may or may not be excepted from this tax. Similarly, it is the intent that for purposes of the base erosion anti-abuse tax that the business judgment rule will not prevent an amount from being excluded under the act. I would like to thank my friend from Ohio for his leadership on international tax issues, especially since he joined this committee. I look forward to continuing to work with him on these important issues.





