Probably a merciful approach to take under the circumstances.
It shouldn't have. Maybe sometimes does, but if it does, it shouldn't.
It is emphatically the duty and the province of the courts to say what the law is.
That's certainly--certainly is how it should work and I suppose consistent with the judges' oath that federal judges mus...
I strongly disagreed with that action and disputed the President's authority to make that as a recess appointment
[O]n January 10 I authorized all defense components to begin taking immediate actions to slow spending in order to preve...
I didn't come prepared to cite Supreme Court precedent on this point but it's a well known fact --
Not aware of one person who is saying children with glasses are going to be taken away from their parents.
Well, you can't assume that because something hasn't happened already, that it couldn't happen in the future.
the U.S. has a moral obligation to act immediately if there's concrete proof Syrian troops have loaded chemical weapons ...
Typically, Anderson, we use treaties to deal with international relations, to deal with the law of nations acting on the...