I would love to explore that question of the impacts.

The Agency should base its work on sound science rather than regulatory ambition.

Unfortunately, despite promises made to the members of this panel, EPA's lawyers have prevented the supposedly independent panel of experts from responding directly to these questions.

EPA's recent announcement that it is walking away from its attempt to link hydraulic fracturing to groundwater issues in Wyoming is the most recent example of the Agency employing what I consider a 'shoot first, ask questions later' policy…

It bothers me that the Office of General Counsel refuses to meet with us.

SABs were created to provide scientific advice to this Committee.

The Agency's figures and characterizations were misleading, lacked relevant context, and were designed to produce self-fulfilling results.

I think that encapsulates pretty well their approach, and I wish we had a little more time to discuss that but perhaps another time.

Mr. Speaker, I wish that our President had the same respect for our Constitution that our Founding Fathers had, but he doesn't. He simply doesn't; for far too many of his political decisions are made with little regard for the sacred…

It would seem to be completely beyond what you just expressed there to just say, well, we are going to disregard the court rulings and we are just going to claim eminent domain.

And if that were to be the case, you could see the resentment and the frustration that many of these folks living in these rural counties would feel.