I would say if I had to guess what percentage of DHS's budget that they strategically source that they could, I would say it is less than 1 percent.
Michael McCaul
The Public Record
Michael Thomas McCaul is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Texas's 10th congressional district since 2005. A member of the Republican Party, he has been active in various legislative efforts, particularly focusing on national security and foreign policy. McCaul has played a significant role in discussions surrounding U.S. relations with countries like Ukraine and Russia, often emphasizing the importance of NATO and the need for a strong response to aggression.
I think what you are talking about is strategic sourcing, which is how do you leverage that buying power.
After expending nearly $1 billion DHS cancelled the program because 'SBInet has had continued and repeated technical problems, cost overruns, and schedule delays.'
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has identified technology acquisition at DHS as an area of high risk.
the best way to protect American citizens is take a share of the Afghanistan security fund assistance of $12 billion or so and redirect that to homeland security so that we can have the resources that we need.
Just yesterday, the Washington Post reported that DHS plans to spend more than $300 million 'on radiation detection equipment that has not been fully tested and may not work.'
the theme of this hearing is cooperation to enhance security, and I think this is a great model that works
So they keep changing the game. When you go to one place, they go somewhere else.





