It was very disturbing to them.
I had assumed it was for protection of individuals that may go onto that property or for liability reasons.
I don't believe that people's safety has been a priority in this situation.
And that flexibility does erode as we get deeper and deeper into sequestration, is that correct?
The thought of losing such highly trained individuals, service men and women, is very troubling to me.
I believe it would be very shortsighted.
Like you, I have heard from service members about their concerns with sequestration.
I was glad to see within your testimony that you talked about the long-range bombers being a priority.
I hope we can rally around what is our most important duty, and that is to provide for the common defense and to protect our national securi...
We cannot continue to bandage old airplanes as potential adversaries roll new ones off the assembly line.
Do you agree or disagree that Assad's reputation within Syria would be strengthened if his regime were able to withstand a U.S. strike?