The chemical industry and Department of Homeland Security have a common goal: to improve the security profile of the chemical sector and reduce the risk of attack against industry ...
I agree. The inefficiency in the process caused a lot of unnecessary work, a lot of information that they have never used, and we don't know...
Progress has been made in all areas of chemical security, but there is still, obviously, work to be done.
The significant policy shift represented by OSHA's February 21, 2013 Letter of Interpretation regarding the accompaniment of OSHA inspectors...
We need to be careful in the changing world that we have where businesses aren't like businesses were 40 or 50 years ago.
We have to be very careful about decisions we make here, because we're talking about tens of millions of individuals.
If we want to create an environment for the largest number of new jobs in America... we need to be very careful and circumspect about any ne...
EPA is very strong on environmental protection and not as strong in site security, physical security, transportation security.
It is the same objective. It is just a different way to submit the site's plan, and it is a more expeditious way to submit the site's plan.
Yes, sir. They seem to be gathering information and holding information within DHS instead of sharing in a partnership, as we started out.
No, there is absolutely no reason. In fact, most facilities are going to communicate with their local Joint Terrorism Task Force and the FBI...