Can you give us a sense in open session of your take on that particular issue?
We have to focus not only on technical and tactical training, but more on values and the professionalism that is require...
the cost to that company would be many times the cost of preemptive action today.
But today you feel confident you could protect the continent of the United States from an attack.
I think we will reach a point that we must have a replacement and I believe we understand where that point is.
I support the triad. I continue to support the triad.
I think the Europeans will stay with us in Afghanistan.
It provides a visible presence of the United States in the littorals.
Absolutely. I think they are, from my other components, all looking very carefully at what they can use.
It seems to be important, on the basis of your comment, in the context of the anti-access doctrine.
Have they been reinvigorated? Are you conducting them on a regular basis, and what are the problems you see?