A stronger Britain on the world stage, able to act as a truly sovereign, independent nation, is a far better partner for the United States.
the burden properly rests on the testifying witness to make these disclosures, and it shouldn't rest on the members of the committee
This amendment was not offered last time we were here. Had it been offered, I would have, of course, supported it.
So I urge my colleagues to support this very straightforward amendment in the name of transparency and urge all members of the committee to ...
It has been a great pleasure to serve on the Foreign Affairs Committee and offer this amendment, which is quite simple.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And I thank you and Ranking Member Engel for your leadership on this committee.
It doesn't do that, Mr. Chairman. It is whether you currently have.
If the gentleman is yielding, I think there is no suggestion in the rule that an unwitting failure to disclose carries any penalty.
Yes. The amendment I believe uses the language 'has.' So it means current arrangements, affiliations, relationships, or substantial financia...
I implore my colleagues not to see this as a partisan issue.
I think if this question were posed to witnesses before the hearing... that is the whole point of putting it in the rules.