Thank you, Congressman Thompson. I would like to add a true story happening right now in my district due to these increases in rates. Nikki Burrows met her husband, bought their home in Muncy in 2006. Insurance premiums more than doubled from $862 to $1,750; but because the Burrows had suffered flood damage from Tropical Storm Lee in 2011, they are subject to an additional 20 percent on their premiums until they max out. Add an annual fee of $4,000 annually. So, in essence, they went from $862 a year to $4,000 a year because they were hit in one of the floods. These Burrows are trapped. These townships and small towns along the rivers are trapped into a situation where the average mean income is about $37,000. That's before taxes. That's before mortgage payment. That's before food for the kids. That's before other insurances. Yet these people are to come up with $4,000, $6,000, $8,000 and $10,000 up front, per year, for flood insurance because of the unintended consequences of Biggert-Waters. At this time, I yield to the gentleman from Massachusetts, Congressman Keating, my colleague across the aisle and a former prosecutor.
Share & report
More from Tom Marino
Like the previous amendment, the gentleman's amendment would strike from the bill the Separation of Powers Restoration Act and core judicial review provisions of the Regulatory Accountability Act. Faced with a runaway administrative state…
How much time is remaining on my side? The CHAIR. The gentleman from Pennsylvania has 16 minutes remaining.
I simply would add that I ask my colleagues to oppose this amendment. As far as the jobs increase, or lack thereof, that my colleague speaks of, we have had the slowest growth rate in jobs in the history of this country. There are millions…
I claim the time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR (Mr. Young of Iowa). The gentleman from Pennsylvania is recognized for 5 minutes.





