Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 11, 2017
Like the previous amendment, the gentleman's amendment would strike from the bill the Separation of Powers Restoration Act and core judicial review provisions of the Regulatory Accountability Act. Faced with a runaway administrative state, we must not gut the bill's crucial reinforcements of judicial checks and balances against agency overreach and abuse. For this reason alone, the amendment should be rejected. In addition, the bill would exclude from title I's long-needed rulemaking reforms numerous types of food safety regulations. All of us support food safety. But the bill does nothing to frustrate the protection of food safety. In fact, it clearly calls upon regulatory agencies to achieve their statutory objectives in this and all areas. Beyond that, it simply ensures that agency rulemaking will avoid unnecessary and overreaching regulations and produce smarter, less costly regulation and guidance when necessary. I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment. I reserve the balance of my time.
Said by
Tom Marino
Republican · Pennsylvania
Source
govinfo.gov
Jan 11, 2017

Share

More from Tom Marino

Feb 13, 2018

It is unfortunate that it seems to me, from what I've heard today, it is democracy of convenience.

congress.gov
Sep 25, 2018

I stand by this is as a good solid piece of legislation.

congress.gov
Apr 11, 2018

We certainly want our environment to be clean, and I am right out there with everybody on that, but we have to get these permits done to create jobs.

congress.gov
Jan 11, 2019

I was unable to vote on Friday, January 11 due to personal reasons. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``yea'' for rollcall No. 26, ``nay'' for rollcall No. 27, ``yea'' for rollcall No. 28, and ``yea'' for rollcall No. 29…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation