I am ready to work, and I hope we can reach an agreement on the long-term reauthorization that improves the program.
I think you said this in your opening statement, but is it your view that implementing Risk Rating 2.0 is a step in the ...
But I would think the taxpayers are the people who should support that and not lower-risk policyholders within the NFIP.
It is a transformational leap forward.
I am hoping that we can find the common ground necessary to avoid a 17th short-term reauthorization.
Put simply, NFIP is broken.
I am open to finding ways to help current, low-income owners afford flood insurance.
It helps move the discussion to data and science and away from what are local politics, in many cases.
Let's do no harm. Right now, under existing law, NFIP is moving toward an actuarially sound premium program.
I am hopeful we can find the common ground necessary to avoid a 17th short-term reauthorization.
I think these property-based subsidies should be phased out over time.