Now, the one thing they have said that makes some sense is the pace is way too slow.
I don't know anywhere else in life where a potential subject of an investigation gets to pick their investigators.
It is my understanding we don't.
You should have a file already, with everything nicely and neatly organized.
You can't claim, oh, this was the independent, be-all, end-all, definitive statement that the ARB made on Benghazi, and then not let us see ...
The subpoena was August 2013. We are not talking a couple months ago. We are talking a year and a half ago.
How can we test the claim when you won't give us what the statute requires?
The number one question I get back home about Benghazi, the number one question I get, why were we there?
It shouldn't be a partisan issue, should it? Republican, Democrat, shouldn't matter?
We should not move on until there is a complete understanding of why requests for additional security were denied.
The facts haven't changed. The evidence hasn't changed. But the way our Government characterizes Benghazi has changed a lot.