I'm concerned, too, about the Union of Concerned Scientists' survey that had 50 percent across all agencies either agreed or strongly agreed that political considerations undermine...
I think that's exactly what we're here for, that politics intervening with scientific integrity is bad whether it comes from the right or fr...
Well, I think any such bold steps would not go unnoticed by the press or this Committee, but that, in and of itself, remains very troubling.
So it's apparent that no matter what Administration, there's a benefit that comes by tightening up and statutorily imposing the integrity ov...
I hope that, as a Committee, we can all work together to strengthen scientific integrity policies.
So if there's some sort of disagreement or whatever within agencies, can agencies actually eliminate the SI office----
Instead of sidelining science, now is the time to invest more heavily in research and scientists.
Science doesn't serve political power, it just tries to tell us the truth.
Scientific integrity is a longstanding concern that transcends any one party or political administration.
Every time government scientific reports are delayed, distorted, or hidden, the American people pay the price.
It ensures transparency and accountability in government, which is part of our Constitutional responsibility as the U.S. Congress.