Therefore, they should be--and I thought the diversity rule that it has to be disclosed or should be disclosed, the diversity on these boards.

I am sure if you recall my letter dealing with diversity is very important to me.

I don't know, sometimes I get nervous when I hear the word modernization because I don't know what that means.

So we are nervous. And as I travel, I think that a number of the employees in the State Department are nervous.

Absolutely. And, again, thank you.

What would it take to do that? Well, it would take peace.

I think it might make sense to set a higher goal, which should have been our goal since 1950.

It seems that our goal there is a non-nuclear peninsula in Korea except that most of the parties don't really want that outcome.

Mr. Chair, the agencies listed in this amendment are by no means perfect, and on multiple occasions I have condemned some of their actions, both publicly and behind closed doors. But I do believe we lose the ability to influence both…

Mr. Chair, I claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from New York is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. Chair, I yield myself such time as I may consume. As stated, now is not the time to walk away from the U.N. Human Rights Council. This amendment would do nothing to change the agencies for the better. It would only weaken our ability…