I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Chair, I rise today in support of this bill that includes an absolutely essential national security program. However, I will support this bill only if the amendment that would impose a warrant requirement on queries regarding American citizens fails. First, a warrant is simply not needed because the query in question is not a new search. It simply identifies any contacts or communications with Americans within the universe of information that was already lawfully obtained from the original search, and that original search can only be of foreign nationals on foreign soil. I spent 10 years as a Federal prosecutor and obtained hundreds of search warrants. Based on that experience, I can say with confidence that requiring a warrant would render this program unusable and entirely worthless. Based on the information available to law enforcement, it would be impossible to get probable cause to obtain a search warrant from a judge in a timely manner. Additionally, even if it were possible, the time required to obtain a search warrant from a judge would frequently fail to meet the urgency posed by a terrorist or other national security threat. {time} 1015 A warrant requirement is unnecessary and unworkable and I, therefore, urge my colleagues to oppose the Biggs amendment. The CHAIR. The time of the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Turner) has expired.
Share & report
More from Dan Goldman
One of my colleagues said that we will hold Members accountable. The Republicans are the party of George Santos. Whom are they holding accountable? The guy is an alleged and acknowledged liar and indicted, and the Republicans protect him…
My esteemed colleague from North Carolina says that lawful speech on the internet should never be prohibited by Federal agencies, by the government. We agree. It is called the First Amendment. It has existed long before H.R. 140 was…
Unfortunately, I was not able to be present to vote on H.R. 3089 and H. Res. 363. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 213 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 214. PERSONAL EXPLANATOIN
Just briefly, we were at that Twitter hearing when the former general counsel of Twitter and of the FBI suggested that there needs to be legislation in order for social media companies to properly coordinate with law enforcement, and we…





