On the recordMarch 25, 2009
Implementing the proposed land preclearance framework would have required the United States to accept a lower level of security at a land preclearance crossing than at any other U.S. port of entry.
Source
congress.govBrian Higgins: “Implementing the proposed land preclearance framework would have required the United States to accept a lower level of…”
Editor's note · Context
Higgins explains the security implications of the land preclearance framework.
Share
More from Brian Higgins
Oct 25, 2023
You should be indignant about what Congress has done to this budget that really serves our people.
Jul 19, 2023
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York will be postponed. Amendment No. 23 Offered by Mr. Donalds The Acting CHAIR. It is…
Other voices in this conversation
