On the recordMarch 25, 2009
Implementing the proposed land preclearance framework would have required the United States to accept a lower level of security at a land preclearance crossing than at any other U.S. port of entry.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Higgins explains the security implications of the land preclearance framework.
Share & report
More from Brian Higgins
May 9, 2023
The unintended consequence of the law meant to lower drug prices may actually increase them.
May 10, 2023
The validity of the public debt shall not be questioned. This is not a political negotiation, this is a moral and legal obligation to be honored.
Apr 25, 2023
Just to close, Mr. Chairman, there has been a lot of talk about making changes to Social Security to secure its long-term viability.
Apr 17, 2023
Protecting the 1,500-hour pilot training rule isn't a partisan issue, it's about maintaining the safety of our air space.
Other voices in this conversation
