On the recordMarch 25, 2009
Implementing the proposed land preclearance framework would have required the United States to accept a lower level of security at a land preclearance crossing than at any other U.S. port of entry.
Source
congress.govImplementing the proposed land preclearance framework would have required the United States to accept a lower level of security at a land preclearance crossing than at any other U.S. port of entry.
Higgins explains the security implications of the land preclearance framework.
Share
More from Brian Higgins
As the Congressman has said, prior to the crash in February 2009, we were of the belief that if the plane said Continental, it was operated by the national carrier. It wasn't true. It was operated by a regional carrier, and there were two…
What is not talked about as much is that American debt in the form of Treasury bonds, bills, and securities is the greatest, safest investment in the world.