the question is no longer whether someone will leave but when.

So the fact that subsidies for fossil fuel corporations are somehow smart but subsidies for the development of solar panels is 'socialist' is just bad faith and it is incorrect.

I think that ironically, despite that fixation, it does not seem that they have actually read the contents of the proposed and presented resolution.

In American history, when we have been presented with a threat on this scale, have we met that threat, the threat on the scale of climate change, have we met that within economic and mobilization on the scale of a war-time level…

So they were kind of creating these second and third degree organizations so that they could distance themselves from the political damage of climate denial, but still fully participate and fund it.

So I think what we have laid out here is a very clear moral problem, and in terms of leadership, if we fail to act, or even if we delay in acting, we will have blood on our hands.

The question is no longer whether someone will leave but when.

Wow. Well, so it was almost like the lobbyists were the pitcher, and they were kind of giving these hand signals letting the delegates know what they can and cannot vote on based on lobbyists' interests.

it is fair to conclude that industry--fossil fuel industry lobbyists are largely responsible for our failure to act on climate change a generation ago

some of the first scientists to sound the alarm about climate change came from within ExxonMobil

climate change is not just an environmental issue. It is also a crisis created by massive corporate corruption and misconduct.