I thank my colleague from Utah for yielding. Under Federal reclamation law, irrigation districts which receive water from a Bureau of Reclamation facility typically repay their portion of the capital costs of water projects under long-term contracts. Under its current contract and current law, Northport is exempt from annual capital repayment if this carriage fee exceeds $8,000 per year. Given that the carriage fee has greatly exceeded this amount every year since the 1950s, Northport's capital repayment debt has been stagnant at over $923,000 since 1952. So long as the debt endures, landowners are subject to burdensome reporting requirements and acreage limitations, and no leverage is generated for the Federal Government. I introduced this bill to provide members of the Northport Irrigation District early repayment authority under their dated reclamation contract. Allowing producers within the Northport Irrigation District to pay off their portion of the contract means the government will receive funds otherwise uncollected, and landowners will be relieved of costly constraints which threaten family-owned operations. For example, at a Water, Power, and Oceans Subcommittee hearing last year, one member of the Northport district testified that acreage limitations will prohibit parents who own land in the district from passing down or even selling farmland to sons and daughters who also own land in the same district.…
Share & report
More from Adrian Smith
I include in the Record these additional letters in opposition to H.R. 2339. 6 Reasons To Oppose HR 2339 (Pallone) Total Flavored Tobacco Product Prohibition 1. This bill bans all flavored tobacco products. That means menthol cigarettes…
I am prepared to close, if there are no other speakers on the other side, and I reserve the balance of my time.
It is interesting listening to the debate here. Certainly my colleague, Mr. Doggett, I think very appropriately pointed out: This bill does not lower the price of insulin by one penny. It just simply shifts around who pays for what. We…
The bill we are considering today is not a path forward. It is a rehash of partisan ideas. We can do better. The American people expect us to do better. Republicans have constructive ideas to offer with demonstrated bipartisan support.





