What's the difference between an ``orderly liquidation fund'' and a taxpayer-funded bailout? There is no difference. Senate Democrats say they need $50 billion to create a new fund so the government can ``wind down'' failing financial firms. House Democrats want $100 billion more. Both bills increase taxes on consumers at a time when they can least afford it. Once the bailout fund is in place, government bureaucrats will decide which Wall Street firms are too big to fail, and then they'll use your hard-earned dollars to pay off the firm's creditors. Sound familiar? It's what they did for companies like AIG with the $700 billion TARP bailout. Now Democrats are pushing ``TARP Two.'' They want to give the government the power of a permanent bailout fund to get back in the game of deciding which of their Wall Street friends to rescue. And their bill does nothing about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac--the two enterprises at the heart of the economic meltdown. Republicans have better solutions. Our measure deals with Fannie and Freddie and places failed firms into bankruptcy. It also provides better and smarter regulatory reform, stops the policy of ``too big to fail,'' and protects taxpayers by ending bailouts once and for all. ____________________
Share & report
More from Virginia Foxx
Madam Speaker, I rise to recognize Jack Roemer of Winston- Salem, North Carolina, who will celebrate his 100th birthday on December 20. There are so many positive things to say about Jack. He is one of the most kindhearted…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 5355) to ensure that the National Advisory Council on Indian Education includes at least 1 member who is the president of a Tribal College or University. The Clerk read the…
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate Congressman Scott's comments very much. We have worked together very well. Now I urge my colleagues to vote for S. 5355, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the…
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on this measure. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the…





