Madam Chairman, I rise in opposition to the gentleman's amendment. Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 is intended to ensure that the environmental costs from the use of alternative fuels are at least no worse than the fuels in use today. It requires the Federal Government do no more harm when it comes to harmful emissions and climate change than it does today through the use of unconventional fuels. Section 526 precludes the use of fuels such as coal-to-liquids, as well as unconventional petroleum fuels such as tar sands and oil shale, unless advanced technologies such as carbon sequestration are used to mitigate their greenhouse gas emissions. This is a provision in law that I think affords important environmental protections, important conditions on the adoption of alternative fuels, so I think it would be a mistake for this body to prohibit in any way the enforcement of section 526. Therefore, I oppose the amendment and ask my colleagues to do likewise. I yield back the balance of my time.
On the recordJune 5, 2013
Share & report
More from David Price
May 12, 2021
But those days of when we do not recognize the strengths of those who come from different places, different lands, different experiences, and our need to embrace them is critical in terms of our children and moving forward in education.
Jun 8, 2021
it is absolutely imperative that the duly appropriated funds with bipartisan approval that were directed toward defense priorities and unconstitutionally diverted from that to pursue this border wall folly, it is absolutely imperative that…
Jun 22, 2021
I want to commend you, first of all, for the relentless message on the importance of turning around this housing crisis in this country and increasing our housing supply.





