I rise in opposition to this rule and to the underlying measure. Madam Speaker, 18 months ago, we gathered in this Chamber to debate economic stimulus. Republicans wanted to help job creators, but the majority said, ``No, let's borrow and spend.'' And borrow and spend they did, to the tune of $862 billion. Back then, the Democrats sent nearly $100 billion to States and districts to prop up school budgets. It would save 300,000 jobs, we were told, and improve public education. It was a one-time investment, we were told. They would not be back for more. Yet here we stand. They are back for more. I know my schools, I know there are challenges, and I understand the difficult budget decisions our governors, superintendents, and school boards are being forced to make. And I know a Federal bailout is not the answer. Spending another $10 billion we do not have will not improve public education or protect the very best teachers. Earlier this year, Education Secretary Arne Duncan told us, ``Today, the status quo clearly isn't good enough.'' Yet the status quo is exactly what this $10 billion will perpetuate.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker opposes a proposed $10 billion federal bailout for education funding.
Share
More from John Kline
The Department of Labor chose once again to take an extreme, partisan approach that will hurt the very people they claim they want to help.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I thank the witnesses for being with us today. Excellent testimony, as we're trying to solve the problem that some of us have been dealing with for a long time.
Former Chairman John Kline, while recognizing that the overtime threshold should be responsibly reformed, called the administration's drastic move extreme and partisan.
No one voted for me in less than 35 days, and I would afford employees the same opportunity to be able to make an informed decision with regard to choosing their union representation.





