On the recordMay 19, 2010
Mr. President, I rise today to clarify some confusion regarding two amendments adopted by the Senate last week to the Wall Street reform bill. Some in the media have characterized the two amendments as conflicting, incompatible, or rendering one another moot, and I wish to put a quick end to that misunderstanding. To draw these conclusions means you think there is only one problem with the credit rating industry. In fact, there have been many problems with the credit rating industry, and the two amendments passed last week tackle two different problems. In the end, these two amendments can be implemented concurrently and effectively. My colleague from Florida offered an amendment that he stated ``writes NRSROs out of the law.'' NRSROs are a select group of credit rating agencies recognized by the SEC. But in fact his amendment does not get rid of credit rating agencies and it does not get rid of the category of NRSROs. This is based on our reading of the text in our office, the Senate legislative counsel's office has confirmed this, and several academics in the field have further confirmed it. The amendment simply does not eliminate NRSROs. Instead, the LeMieux amendment eliminates provisions in Federal laws that require reliance upon ratings from NRSROs. For example, this amendment eliminates a provision that requires certain State-chartered banks to only buy securities with top NRSRO ratings.…





