What is the justification for that except to save tax money? And that is perfectly legitimate, right?
Carl Levin
The Public Record
Carl Levin was a prominent American politician who served as a United States Senator from Michigan from 1979 until 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, Levin was known for his leadership on the Senate Armed Services Committee, where he played a key role in shaping U.S. military policy and defense spending. Throughout his tenure, he was an advocate for various issues, including environmental protection and consumer rights.
We see in the Microsoft case a very significant transfer of revenue and profit overseas to a wholly owned subsidiary in some cases that has no employees whatever.
Our code is far too complex, and I also agree that the fact that you try to lower your taxes is not illegal in and of itself.
This Subcommittee has demonstrated in hearings and comprehensive reports how various schemes have helped to shift income to offshore tax havens and avoid U.S. taxes.
I think we probably should then official ask the Social Security Administration to answer that question since this panel is not able to answer it.
I agree with him. Just how does a judge do three or four or five cases a day?
I have a few more questions, and then we will call on other Senators to see if they have additional questions.
Is there a way--and I do not want to misstate Dr. Coburn's question because he states them better than I can.
We just simply should not have 20 or 25 percent of the cases that have, according to the Social Security Administration, errors or inadequacies in them.
I do not think it is 1:4/4:1. Are there any other reasons that you can think of besides demographics as to why there has been that shift?
I wonder if it would be agreeable to you, Senator, and also to Dr. Coburn, if we ask actually the Social Security Administration for their reaction officially to the recommendations in the report.





