His answer was, that is correct.
We cannot blur that responsibility. We have got to focus it so that we can hold folks accountable if there are failures.
My major concern has been and continues to be, where will the principal responsibility for analyzing foreign intelligence rest?
I am not satisfied with what I understand the answers were.
The number one threat that we all face is the proliferation of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction.
I want to concur in what he said about our borders.
Are we getting cooperation, Admiral, from Indonesia in terms of the war on terrorism?
The Navy is busier than it was last year. How do you square that?
I do not know that anybody has officially told us that. Is that in fact correct?
So therefore, the 2004 system can't be tested as a complete system with a realistic long-range target.
So that it is not limited to development testing, so that operational testing will take place on this 2004 system?