It was transmitted to the analysts that market share was important.
Or if the bank got mad enough at an analyst and it was contentious enough, then you might tell the analyst, we are removing you for your own...
That meaning worse?
You needed more resources?
February 2007, we need to talk about getting more resources in general.
Was that satisfactory, to have that kind of a backlog?
Should be.
Would you agree that there was great pressure to feed the origination machine?
In July 2007, did you know who David Goldstein was?
I think you have a long way to go in acknowledging what happened to your agencies.
Is there any evidence that market share drove ratings? Have you seen it? Have you looked at these exhibits?