resilience equals diversification, and I think desal is an important part, piece of that.
what can we do in federal policy to help in the areas that you are working on, whether it is tax policy, incentives or regulation?
I would be interested, if you could supply this for the record, in a comparison between buying a filtration plant and protecting naturally.
We do know, however, that reuse might fill as much as 50 percent of our future growth projections.
Well, as demand increases and supplies either stay constant or dwindle, that is going to be a logical outcome.
I would say we also need better data to make better policy, and I find that very concerning for all of the work that we are doing here.
Are there differences in abilities to finance those two solutions?
the amount of fresh water remains constant.
It is hard to beat free. It comes out of the sky.
But for the record, if you could supply that, I would like to see a comparison of how tax policy, grant policy and regulatory policy affects...
Can we just continue to absorb growing population in Phoenix and Los Angeles?