You think it's constitutional to ban that.
the First Amendment doesn't need a fairness act. The First Amendment is supreme to any statute we might pass.
I think fundamentally that less government is better.
Since then, churches and other c(3)'s have had to decide whether or not to directly violate the law and risk potentially...
But it's up to them. We agree under the First Amendment, they define their religion any way they want.
I think Rabbi Saperstein's with me on this.
I get complaints on a daily basis pretty much from my constituents who feel like the whole system is a scam.
But how do they profit from it? They take over the student's account?
So just to get you straight there, they are using your website essentially as the framework to access their victims.
Do we need to create an ombudsperson, somebody who is just a champion of the students and the graduates to make sure tha...
The overall institutional sense that I get is one of basic passivity and reactivity to events rather than getting on top...