Political Quotes

On the recordApril 20, 2021
Let me address a couple of the specious constitutional objections that have been raised by our colleagues on the other side. To begin with, it would be unconstitutional to turn the District of Columbia into a State. It would almost certainly be that, but that is not what the proposal is. The proposal is to redraw the boundaries of the District of Columbia to cede the residential lands to the new State to admit it. For that, there is both sound constitutional and historical precedent. For one thing, Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 says that Congress shall ``exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever'' over the district that is to become the seat of government, meaning that Congress has the authority to modify the boundaries of the District of Columbia, which it has done. It did that, actually, in 1791. Not long after the original boundaries were set, James Madison and 13 other Founders themselves voted to alter the boundaries. But our colleagues seem to believe that the boundaries of the District can't be altered by Congress. In 1846, most significantly, Congress gave one-third of the District of Columbia to the Commonwealth of Virginia at the behest of slave masters, who correctly anticipated that the slave traffic would be abolished within the District of Columbia. It was given back, demonstrating that the authority of Congress to change the boundaries of the District exists.…
Said by
Jamie Raskin
Democratic · Maryland
Source
govinfo.gov
Apr 20, 2021

Share

More from Jamie Raskin

Jul 9, 2026

I hope—and will do everything I can to guarantee—that Davey gets true due process and a fair trial on these absurdly trumped-up charges.

wisconsinexaminer.com
Jul 28, 2026

The most recent quid pro quo that Fifa and President Trump orchestrated is not a victimless crime. It hurts Americans.

theguardian.com
Jul 16, 2026

The story is that he continues to lie about it, and they’ve organized an entire political party, albeit a dwindling and shrinking one, around a lie.

huffpost.com
Jul 9, 2026

Hearn would never desecrate a federal building or landmark by writing his name on it or affixing his name illegally to it or engaging in any other kind of political graffiti, vandalism or delinquency.

wisconsinexaminer.com

Other voices in this conversation