As a matter of principle, regulatory benefits should justify their costs, and EPA's pursuit of this coal-killing regulation, despite its own admission that the rule has negligible benefits is mind boggling.
On the recordJune 5, 2012
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Harris criticizes EPA's regulations for lacking justifiable benefits.
Share & report
More from James Harris
Feb 11, 2025
In flagrant disregard for the clear statutory text, Ms. Harris was purportedly terminated without basis, justification or authority.
Mar 4, 2025
In concept, the president has said he needs this for his agenda. We support the president's agenda.
Apr 8, 2025
To the extent that Humphrey's Executor requires otherwise, the Department intends to urge the Supreme Court to overrule that decision, which prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President's behalf.
Feb 13, 2025
If you go above $2 trillion in deficit reduction in those other committees, you can actually raise the amount of tax cuts.





