On the recordJune 5, 2012
The ABA, which we know is a prestigious, distinguished representation of the American bar, says that when we passed the ``equal pay for equal work'' act, it was landmark. Quoting again from their letter: But, in the 50 years since its passage, this historic legislation has become outdated and ineffective, and wage discrimination remains a persistent, wide-spread, and pernicious problem. In commenting on this bill, the ABA says: The Paycheck Fairness Act would update key provisions of the Equal Pay Act of 1963 without altering the basic scheme of this historic statute or imposing excessive, novel burdens on employers. Remember, again, this is not Senator Mikulski, this is the ABA saying it will not impose excessive or novel burdens on employers. Indeed, most of the proposed changes are borrowed from other civil rights statutes that prove more effective in eradicating workplace discrimination. This goes to what the ABA says. But now, Mr. President, I would like to yield 6 minutes to the distinguished gentlelady from New Hampshire--a Governor, a Senator, a real advocate who has had to not only be a leader in passing legislation but in implementing it. We welcome her insights and advocacy. The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from New Hampshire.
