Political Quotes

On the recordMarch 8, 2012
This amendment is actually just to piggyback on the previous one that we just adopted by voice vote. It's just a little bit more specific. And honestly, had I known the gentleman was going to offer the other amendment, I might have worked with him a little bit more to make it more specific. In some levels it's redundant, but this particular one is more specific as to what the issue is. It's actually the specific issue that Mr. Schweikert pointed out, which is the definition of the beneficial owner. {time} 1040 Right now, when Facebook went public, they allowed one or two or three or a handful of investors to be counted as one. Broker-dealers can hold investments on behalf of thousands, an unlimited number of people. The concept of having 2,000 or 1,000, I respect the gentleman's comments previously that there is no magic number--2,000 sounds fine, 1,000 was fine. That's all well and good, and there is no magic answer to that number. I think the compromise that was reached was pretty reasonable. At the same time, what it doesn't address, which is exactly what the gentleman said earlier, is that each one of these 2,000 people in theory and in reality often do hold the beneficial interest of tens of thousands of people. I'm not talking about mutual funds. But these are the people that have the authority to direct the broker-dealer to act on their behalf.…
Said by
Mike Capuano
Democratic · Massachusetts
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 8, 2012

Share

More from Mike Capuano

Jun 19, 2018

it is unequivocally directed to your superiors who do have the authority to say no, and should have said no to this policy.

congress.gov
Sep 12, 2018

I also want to state that, from what I see, there has been a lot of progress made.

congress.gov
Jun 20, 2018

If your bosses told you to do something and you didn't do it for 8 years, how long do you think you would be employed?

congress.gov
Jun 19, 2018

What is difficult for me to understand is the obsession on just one border, and the obsession on only one fix to the issue there.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation