Under my amendment, chemicals which have already been deemed by EPA to be worthy of further assessment and have also been deemed as a carcinogen by either the National Institutes o...
We should be working to strengthen the scientific information EPA uses to protect public health and improve air and water quality.
These issues over the use of science would benefit greatly from having experts in the use of science explain to us the pros and cons of this...
I have a number of concerns about the Secret Science Reform Act of 2015.
Peer review is the foundation of modern science. It is a self-correcting process that has helped to advance science, technology and public h...
This amendment would change the criteria for scientific and technical information by striking the language that effectively limits what info...
This bill sets up a trial process to determine a chemical safety with the EPA serving as the judge and the jury.
The EPA already attempted to ban asbestos but was challenged by industry, and the ban was struck down by the court.
Science should be at the foundation of health and environmental policymaking.
Our Nation's environmental laws have succeeded over the years because EPA is required to use the best available science.
To add another 7 years, when we already know what the problem is, to tie the hands of the EPA, really in my opinion is unnecessary.