One of my questions asked how NOAA intends to incorporate feedback received during the stock assessment update to improve the transparency and scientific credibility of future effo...
The Federal Government has been paying for actual physical observation, and as that money gets pulled back, there has to be a substitute, an...
Honestly, my mother always said the most important question in life is answering the question of compared to what, so yes. This is not as go...
this bill will waste taxpayer dollars and will further divert the focus away from the critical need of ensuring that scientific panels advis...
If they are willing to serve, I do not think personal attacks upon their integrity should be a part of this process.
Is it also true that during any rulemaking process that uses Scientific Advisory Board information the EPA would have to respond in writing ...
I agree with you that confession is good for the soul.
Just for the record, the endangerment finding was made by the Bush administration, Administrator Johnson, back in 2008.
I remember December 2009 very well. I remember it because then I was the chairman, I was in the Majority.
Taken to an extreme, Mr. Faber, it could result in paralysis?
I think it is absolutely imperative that we do have the best scientists and that we also make sure they are properly vetted as well but that...