I hope that's true because I would hate to think that the Department intentionally abused earnings data and dragged its feet to trigger cancelation of the MOU.

I think it's a failure to enforce--the rule would give an additional $5.3 billion to almost exclusively for-profit programs.

Now, the rule can only be enforced if a second year of failing ratings occurs. Yet, under the Trump administration, the Department has issued no additional ratings since the 2017 data set.

The evidence is clear that if we do not invest the necessary funds today, we will pay the price in people's health tomorrow.

Yes or no, do you believe the substandard public housing conditions pose a risk to tenants' physical, mental, and emotional health if left unaddressed?

And so it pains me that your gifted hands and mine are doing the bidding and carrying the water of what I believe to be one of the most morally bankrupt Presidents in our nation's history.

Would you let your grandmother live in public housing?

Housing is a fundamental human right, and the displacement of families should be regarded as the public health crisis that it is.

Yes or no, if left unaddressed, which I believe they are unaddressed because this budget does not reflect the need, do you believe the substandard public housing conditions post a risk to tenants physical, mental and emotional health?

Do Ms. Norcross and her family deserve to live in these conditions because they are poor?

But, again, given your medical background, perhaps you could weigh in on the health consequences of failing to invest in safe housing.