This doesn't have anything to do with justice. This has everything to do with power.

I just find all of this fascinating.

Let's begin with the basic premise that exceptional qualifications, not race, skin, color, gender, or religion should be the most important factor when evaluating a judicial nominee.

Nomination to the bench should not be decided by identity politics but instead by qualifications.

The truth is simple. The only times my Democratic colleagues believe someone meets their diversity test is when they are ideologically aligned.

I believe that we will show today, although the goal of more women and more broadly diversity, that we also recognize that we want to select, going forward, the best and the brightest and most qualified...

By allowing Big Tech to operate under Section 230 as is, we will be allowing these companies to get our children hooked on their destructive products for their own profit.

Mr. Chair, thank you for the time and the hearing. This is a bipartisan concern, and so we treat it as such.

That is why Congress enacted the antitrust laws more than a century ago, to keep our economy competitive and to avoid the immense concentration of economic power that we see today.

We have spent nearly two years understanding the complex problems posed by big tech companies that have full control over their marketplaces and now we finally turn to the big question which is, how do we fix this?

I am very concerned how anticompetitive conduct by dominant firms, like self-preferencing, is undermining innovation and preventing competitors from entering the market with better services.