OK. So, under Option 1, the solution is to lower the water level allowed in the canal to a lower 'safe water level.' Is that right?
So, wherever there is not a breach, which is 99 percent of the walls we are talking about, there is the same old faulty ...
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I believe this language covers Option 2 more clearly than it covers Option 1.
But they provide a heck of a lot more protection from flooding.
The safe level is seven or eight feet below the top of the wall. Clearly, that is diminished capacity from the original ...
Thanks, Madam Chair, and thank you again General for your leadership.
I continue to believe that the space program represents one of the best uses of taxpayer's dollars, because it is an inv...
I am very concerned about the constraint he was formally given.
I hope it is not acted upon in that spirit, but that is what it says.
Exactly my point. It, as a practical matter, would be impossible.