I would add for clarification, Mr. Chairman, that the provision the gentleman referred to is section 408 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980, which exempts those employees in foreign countries that surely would not want them uncovered under E-Verify. In response to the gentleman's objection, I have tried to fool E- Verify by punching data into it. The longest delay I could create was 6 seconds. So as far as undue burden is concerned, a 6-second wait in the most extreme circumstances I don't think is extreme at all. This is the right thing for the Federal Government to at least exercise the laws that we pass and we want to impose upon the rest of the country and upon ourselves. So it is a clarification amendment, Mr. Chairman. I urge its adoption, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. King). The amendment was agreed to. Amendments En Bloc No. 2 Offered by Mr. Diaz-Balart of Florida
Share & report
More from Steve King
There is no ability for the employee to opt out, to say that she or he does not want personal information to be shared.
Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman from Texas for yielding. I rise in opposition to this rule and primarily in opposition to H.R. 1230, that is one of the subjects of this combined rule that we have. The legislation that is coming before…
This critical legislation aims to ensure that our nation's veterans with service-connected disabilities are not simply afforded a wheelchair, but are equipped with the very best wheelchair.
Madam Speaker, I wanted to add another piece to this. This is an observation that I think applies across this country and a lot of places today. Some of my constituents made a practice of going out through the parking lot at the packing…





