It certainly does. Even if the process we talked about is not followed, once a hold comes to light in the form of an objection, someone will be required to own up to that hold. It will no longer be possible for a leader or their designee to object but claim it is not their objection. They can say on whose behalf they are objecting and why not. We also require Senators placing a hold to give their permission to object in their name. Still, if a Senator objects and does not name another Senator as having the objection, and another Senator does not promptly come forward claiming the objection, the Senator making the objection will be listed in the relative section of the Senate calendar as having placed that hold. I yield, for a final conclusion, to the Senator from Oregon.
Share & report
More from Chuck Grassley
Mr. President, over the last 2 weeks, during the Senate recess, I continued my annual 99 county meetings across Iowa. My travels brought me to the Western Iowa community of Jefferson, in Greene County, for a Q&A. I often say Iowans don't…
Congress has for too long delegated its clear authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce to the executive branch.
Madam President, the Senate will soon vote to confirm my good friend and fellow Iowan Matt Whitaker to be the U.S. Ambassador to NATO. I support his nomination and urge all my colleagues to vote for his confirmation. Matt is someone who is…
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the text of my amendments at the desk be printed in the Record. There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: (Purpose: To improve the resolution) On…





