Indexed annuities combine aspects of insurance and securities and are sold primarily as investment products. Consumers across the country, including some in Hawaii, have been harmed by the deceptive manner in which these products are being sold. For example, a seller in Hawaii pushed equity indexed annuities to collect unreasonably high commissions at the expense of senior citizens. Those investors were harmed by these financial products. Exempting indexed annuities from securities regulation would establish a dangerous precedent that promotes the development of financial products not subject to regulation and investor protection standards. Opponents might argue that federal regulation is unnecessary or distracts from state regulation. However, Federal regulation is necessary to help protect investors by providing consistency and uniformity because securities laws can vary across states. Others are concerned that Federal regulation will limit access to indexed annuities. I counter that these products should only be sold when they are subject to the strong disclosure, suitability, and sales practice standards provided within the context of our Nation's securities laws.
Editor's note · Context
Senator Akaka addresses the regulation of indexed annuities and their impact on consumers.
Share
More from Daniel Akaka
I would like to announce that the Committee on Indian Affairs will meet during the session of the Senate on September 20, 2012, in room SD-628 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, at 2:15 p.m., to conduct a hearing entitled ``Advancing…
All of us here in this room and the Committee staff, all will have to continue to educate our colleagues here in the Congress to know as much as they can about our indigenous people.
today I rise to introduce S. 3685, The Department of the Interior Tribal Self-Governance Act of 2012. I am proud to introduce this bill and I am thankful for the cosponsorship of my friend and colleague, the Vice Chairman of the Indian…





