this is a tax credit extension, as with the previous amendment, but with a different pay-for. The previous was deductibility of punitive damages. This one is from the stimulus money. Both accomplish the same thing, which is allowing Americans who qualified for the tax credit by contracting by April 30 to close by September 30 rather than by June 30. The reason we are pushing it forward is because FDIC rules, regulatory rules and appraisal rules, are forcing closings taking as long as 120 days. This doesn't give anybody a credit who hasn't already earned it. It just allows them to take advantage of it by protracting the closing date so they would have enough time to close. I urge a positive vote on the Isakson amendment.
Johnny Isakson: “this is a tax credit extension, as with the previous amendment, but with a different pay-for. The previous was…”
Editor's note · Context
Isakson discusses a tax credit extension and its implications for homebuyers.
Share
More from Johnny Isakson
I am delighted to join Senator Tester on the floor as ranking member of the Veterans' Committee, and he and I as chairman have worked together on many, many issues. And today, we are glad to come to the floor and tell the Senate how much…
I am not saying it to be ugly. Facts are facts, and I am scared that a Freudian slip--which I am sure that probably was or something like that--might be something that causes us to get lost again. No. 1, I want to point out that in your…
I appreciate the remarks of the majority leader. If he would wait 1 minute, I just want to make a little offer to him. I am not going to get into an argument with him, but he brought up more things than I like to bring up in one speech…
Reserving the right to object and I will yield to the Senator from Alabama. I want everybody to listen closely. Senator, please listen to me closely. You are a great friend. I love you to death. But do you know what you just did? When you…





